1. Anonymous said:

    Unfortunately all the EPA unions, thousands of health professionals and 98% of European communities agree with the overwhelming evidence that fluoride is harmful to human health. And I would say the fact that Dupont, GM and Alcoa paid for all the research resulting in water fluoridation is a kind of conspiracy. Maybe you should check your facts on this one. See http://www.stuartbramhall.com.

    December 2, 2010
  2. Guest said:

    f*ck you. a lot.

    December 3, 2010
  3. The reason for this is that there is ample evidence to support his conspiracy case is available (is not), is probably due to the fact that most people can not accept that such a terrible crime could really be implemented by a single die on the work of mail order sales of rifles, which was in the right place at the right time.

    December 11, 2010
  4. skeptic said:

    These are nothing but totally unfounded anti-conspiracy theories.

    December 17, 2010
  5. patrick bateman said:

    The writer in this is such a tool. He thinks he’s so clever about the 9/11 story. Bush didn’t get Hitler status etc….answer me this…. Why dont they show footage of the pentagon crash? why did Norad not react? why have they never found black boxes but found a passport? I could go on and on. You are a loser.

    March 27, 2011
    • Jack Maddison said:

      1: There is footage of the pentagon crash from CCTV but other than that why would there be any footage.
      2: NORAD didn’t react firstly because a training excersize was scheduled for 11th September (I write the date like that because I am British.), which caused confusion as to wether or not jets needed to be scrambled. Secondly, once the jets were deployed a navigation error delayed an intercept.
      3: recovering the black boxes would be pointless. A black box is mainly for an accidental crash. It records all the flight information such as speed , altitude, bearings ect. If black boxes were recovered regarding 11th September, all they would tell us is how terrorists crashed the plane, not who, why or any other usefull information.
      You should really check your own knowledge before insulting someone else.

      April 4, 2013
  6. Cass Sunstein said:

    9/11: “putting aside the complete lack of empirical evidence or solid science to support any single aspect of the conspiracy”
    – I’m guessing a peer reviewed paper published by accredited scientists showing irrefutably that explosive materials were found at the WTC doesn’t cut it for you?

    JFK: “not that there is a wealth of evidence to support to conspiracist’s case is available (it isn’t)”
    – Two words: Zapruder film.

    To debunk something means you actually have to discuss the issue: not ignore the main points of the argument and rely on straw men and ad hominems.

    April 14, 2011
  7. Myth Busted said:

    They proved that the moon landing was for real on Mythbusters a couple of years back.

    April 28, 2011
    • AsPiEdAwG said:

      Mythbusters? Wow. Fail.

      October 24, 2011
  8. Agal said:

    I believe in the J.F.K theory that the man who killed Lee Harvey Oswald was in on the plan and killed Lee so Lee couldn’t talk

    May 15, 2011
  9. RonTruth said:

    The problem for those who doubt the JFK and 9/11 conspiracies’ existence is that there were many similarities between the two events that were 38 years apart. The first set of similarities was the immediacy of the government’s story within just a few hours of both events.

    In the JFK case, J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director, sent out a hand-written note as a memo to the Dallas Police Department just 2 hours after Oswald was picked up at the place where his CIA handler, David Atlee Phillips was to pick him up, take him to Redbird Airport for a flight back to New Orleans. But, David Phillips was in cohouts with James Files and Charles Nicoletti who were from Chicago organized crime. E. Howard Hunt’s French killer was on the grassy knoll, with Gerry Patrick Hemming, a CIA gun for hire who helped train Cuban anti-Castro fighters before the Bay of Pigs invasion, along with Johnny Roselli and James E. Files who was just 19 when out of the Special Forces, and needed a job. He had been rescued from a potential court-martial for killing two US soldiers after being challenged by Laotian soldiers over his bravery.

    The CIA had Files right where they wanted him. He had to cooperate with them. When JFK turned against going all-out in Vietnam, Files and Nicoletti’s bosses at the Pentagon and CIA contacted David Phillips who contacted General Ed Landsdale and CIA nutjob, William King Harvey. Lansdale was in Dealey Plaza at the time of the shooting, photographed walking past “the three tramps.”

    With police photos showing a bullet hole through the front windshield, from in front, another bullet whole in the inside chrome around the front windshield, Kennedy hit twice from different positions from behind, and twice from in front, including the frontal head injury as described the afternoon of Nov. 22, 1963, by the doctors who tried to save Kennedy’s life, plus one bullet shell fo9und on the south side of Elm Street, and a bullet strike on a manwhole cover on the north side of Elm Street, and a bullet strike on the south curb of Elm street, a part of which struck James Tague who stood in the sidewalk opening of the Commerce street passthrough the triple underpass, you should by now get the picture> There is NO WAY in the hot place that it was not done in a conspiracy!

    Or, how many shootings took place, not only in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas, but in that freaking limousine? Now, come on poodles, let’s us use our curly little heads for something besides grandma’s hair brush.

    June 21, 2011
  10. mimiuex said:

    That’s the absolute best you can offer in the way of evidence? Believe it or not, we conspiracy theorists do our research, and in my opinion you sir, have not done yours.

    July 30, 2011
  11. AsPiEdAwG said:

    “Everything is true. God’s an Astronaut. Oz is Over the Rainbow, and Midian is where the monsters live.”


    October 24, 2011
  12. RonTruth said:

    The very idea that the assassination of President Kennedy was not a conspiracy, is provably false.Folloein sre just the photographic evidence alone:
    Bullet hole in front windshield, from front to back

    Bullet hole, from the back, on a horizontal trajectory, in the chrome around the front windshield.

    Bullet mark on the cover of a mahhole, photo with police officer checking it out.

    Bullet from the north grasy knoll picked up by
    Deputy Sheriff, Buddy Walthers,

    Bullet fragment strikes the south side of Elm st, slides under the grass of the south knoll for about
    two feet, and comes out of the ground near where Jean
    Lollis Hill and Mary Ann Moorman stood as Moorman took her famous Palaroid photo, which shows two figures, standing in separate locations behind the then white picket fence, each man holding a rifle.

    Kennedy with a wound on his back, five and a half
    inches below his collar bone, which only went in about
    two inches, and stopped, not going all the way through Kennedy’s body.

    One bullet, fired from a low trajectory; to low for it to have come from a high window of the Texas School Book Depository, hitting Kennedy in the head, starting to shove it forward, but another bullet fired a small fraction of a second from the fence, the right front of Kennedy’s head, pushes Kennedy’s head violently backward and to his left.

    Another bullet fired from a high trajectory from the book depository, but from a right to left trajectory
    into Gov. Connolly’s back, under the right armpit, moving through a large rib in front of Connolly’s chest, and burying itself into Connolly’s left thigh.

    Another bullet fired into Kennedy’s throat from the front, from the area of the shrubs that surrounded the large monument near the large, curved Pergola. The doctors all said it was originally a small wound of entrance from in front. Not from the rear.

    Why did the Warren Commission try to say Kennedy only had two wounds. when the photos themselves show at least three wounds in Kennedy?

    If you look at one of the more cleaned up versions of Abraham Zapruder’s film of the assassination, you will see, at the corner of the outside chrome around the front windshield on the passenger side, two quick flashes from guns being fired from the fence on the knoll. You will notice that Kennedy body, and Connolly’s body, lurch at exactly the same split second that you see the flashes reflected in the chrome around the outside chrome surrounding the front
    windshield on Secret Servide Agent, Roy Kellerman’s side. That could never have been just reflections
    from sunlight just as Kennedy and Connolly were being hit.

    Finally, Gerald R. Ford, in 1995 when the Assassinations Records Review Board found more than
    40,000 handwritten pages of Ford’s Warren Commosssion
    notes in which Ford ordered the medical illustrator to
    move upward by “several inches the would on President Kennedy’ back to “clarify things.” When the Board found Ford in Vale, Colorado, they read him his own notes to the Commission. Ford had no choice but to admit makeing the change. What Ford’s change did was
    convict Oswald in the public’s mind. Ford covered up the actual evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald had been SET UP to take the blame for what the CIA and their allies in organzed crime did, facilitated by Johnson’ orders to the Secret Service to stand down rathet than beef up their security work.

    Go to site, YouTube Secret Service Stand Down, and see it happen at Love Field, Dallas, Texas, for yourselves.
    Watch the frustrated response of SS Agent, Henry Rifka as he responds to the stand down order by Emory Roberts, his supervisor in the SS follow up car.

    The fact of conspiracy cannot any longer be denied by rational human minds. Scientifially IMPOSSIBLE NOW.

    November 4, 2011
    • The Painful Truth said:

      Names and details can not always be “nailed down” — but in the case of Japanese attacj, 9/11 attack and Kennedy assination — ther esi no way these thing could have happenend with out some knowledge. After all , even President Lincold was aware that there were peole who wanted to kill him — it was not a total surprise. Parel Habor was not a total surprise and the the CIA and othet governmnet agencies were picking up “buss” about an attack (like a 9/11) for a good while before it happened. The BUsh adminstration chosie not to belive it and re-direct attention and once it did happend — misdirect the American people about who did it and why — for their own agenda. That is a fact.

      April 9, 2012
  13. nedic nikola said:

    i have experimental traying to make not free bat cheap energy from i cant explain vhat resource is this i think that is coming from litle vormhole thet i create i dont wont explain hau i am exacly make it bat baisic it’s that ai have secesefoil rotate auar space to spead of light or meyby not so mutch .i mast explain that is a prototype end i have not enything with i can make this mesures bat results is for nau very inpresive my research do not match with any theory of fisic known today end i cant control enythyng of this proces meyby thet control itself or iam wrong thinking bat this styped vormhole is selfdistructed abaut lest of one secend or lees i also think dhat energy is very dangeros bicos oll cameras in aur bilding end oll tv and mobile phone after this experiment not working end no bady can fix it exept cable tv instalation i am ysing too batery from one coma fife wolt end im think bicause is this hepend end after this batery normaly working thhat is very bead aidea to experiment with this.if anyvan have this experience please send email..nedicnikola39@yahoo.com

    April 3, 2012
  14. The Painful Truth said:

    Most of the so-called conspiracies the writer discusses here can indeed be explained away — however, in some case — especially the 9/11 and JFK assination — he is too quite — and too glib in his dismissional of ‘facts” or evidenct put out tere — I would agree that some “theiroes” are more farfetched than others — but in the case of 9/11 and JFl’s kijjunbg it might not be so much the pre-planning as the “cover up” or the spin on it for the work to the advantage if the “powers that be” – For example — while I don’t know if Bush was behind the Twin towers falling — his adminstration was less than proactive in stopping it (having planty of evidence before hand that there was something going to happen — like FDR and the Japaniese attack On Parell Habor) to use the attack to advance their own agenda — US to get in to WII in support of ally — great Britian -( After all — despite the writer’s satement –FDR was well aware that Germany would support Japan’s plan being therre wewre inthe axis together).- GW Bush and his buddies wanting to invade Iraq and finish the unfinidhed businees of his father — and spent years of misinformation to justify that mission — Regarding JFK — while the exact details or “murky” — there clearly eas moe to it than onre “fruit cake” and than another niut — too many unanswerd question and “dumb luck” allwign both Oswarld and Ruby both to do wha they did withour some outside help. Not all “theories” are nuts. —

    April 9, 2012
  15. Matt Price said:

    Save England from the Nazis? You really have a warped opinion on ww2. Im not suprised as from reading lots of online content, it seems that americans have been fed a false history. The average Americans were guilty of cowardice if anything prior to entering ww2 and had no interest in entering the war and it wasnt for some saviour mission that they did. Yes, Roosevelt may have wanted to stop the nazis but the majority of america didnt care. The USA more than likely only enterrd as it saw a rival for superpower status. When it comes to ‘saving’ England, I think you mean the UK. Another yank stating facts yet getting basic geography wrong. Anyway,America did not save the UK, the complete opposite is true actually. As stated above, the USA had no interest in entering the war and during the battle of britain, the UK single handedly became the first nation to defeat the germans to the extent that the invasion of britain was cancelled as they couldnt beat the british in the air or sea. Where the USA ‘saved’ the UK here is anyones guess. The UK thwarted the germans single handed and gave all allied nations a base to launch the D Day landings. People like you irriate me so much as you have no idea what happened during ww2 or in general, yet state ludicrous ‘facts’ based on propaganda youve been fed.

    December 23, 2012

Comments are closed.